Asked  2 Years ago    Answers:  5   Viewed   65 times

Some guy called one of my Snipplr submissions "crap" because I used if ($_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD'] == 'POST') instead of if ($_POST)

Checking the request method seems more correct to me because that's what I really want to do. Is there some operational difference between the two or is this just a code clarity issue?

 Answers

4

Well, they don't do the same thing, really.

$_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD'] contains the request method (surprise).

$_POST contains any post data.

It's possible for a POST request to contain no POST data.

I check the request method — I actually never thought about testing the $_POST array. I check the required post fields, though. So an empty post request would give the user a lot of error messages - which makes sense to me.

Wednesday, October 26, 2022
1

You should point to your vendor/autoload.php at Settings | PHP | PHPUnit when using PHPUnit via Composer.

This blog post has all the details (with pictures) to successfully configure IDE for such scenario: http://confluence.jetbrains.com/display/PhpStorm/PHPUnit+Installation+via+Composer+in+PhpStorm

Related usability ticket: http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/WI-18388

P.S. The WI-18388 ticket is already fixed in v8.0

Sunday, July 31, 2022
 
4

On Mac OS X environment variables available in Terminal and for the normal applications can be different, check the related question for the solution how to make them similar.

Note that this solution will not work on Mountain Lion (10.8).

Sunday, November 6, 2022
5

For testing purposes you can force the use of the index by "disabling" sequential scans - best in your current session only:

SET enable_seqscan = OFF;

Do not use this on a productive server. Details in the manual here.

I quoted "disabling", because you cannot actually disable sequential table scans. But any other available option is now preferable for Postgres. This will prove that the multicolumn index on (metric_id, t) can be used - just not as effective as an index on the leading column.

You probably get better results by switching the order of columns in your PRIMARY KEY (and the index used to implement it behind the curtains with it) to (t, metric_id). Or create an additional index with reversed columns like that.

  • Is a composite index also good for queries on the first field?

You do not normally have to force better query plans by manual intervention. If setting enable_seqscan = OFF leads to a much better plan, something is probably not right in your database. Consider this related answer:

  • Keep PostgreSQL from sometimes choosing a bad query plan
Wednesday, October 5, 2022
 
2

The database is the same, meaning that the SQL is fully compatible to any other PostgreSQL installation around (save for the GIS data formats).

The main difference is that there is a bunch of modules and tools bundled with Postgres Plus that you would have to collect and install separately and by yourself otherwise. Thus the main advantage is easy and speedy installation.

Most of the bundled stuff looks like it's freely available from other sources. That Postgres Studio application looks suspiciously close to pgAdmin III.

Wednesday, November 16, 2022
 
Only authorized users can answer the search term. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged :
 

Browse Other Code Languages